Cover Image for Elon Musk's Access to the Department of Energy Could Pose a Nuclear Threat.
Sun Feb 09 2025

Elon Musk's Access to the Department of Energy Could Pose a Nuclear Threat.

Is the nuclear dismantling process a "woke" approach?

Elon Musk, recognized as the richest person in history, has taken on a prominent role in the administration of Donald Trump, becoming a key advocate for his government. His organization, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), enjoys unprecedented access to the government's data and computing systems. Recently, it was revealed that this access extends to the Department of Energy (DOE), responsible for managing U.S. nuclear weapons. This information raised enough concern for Secretary of Energy Chris Wright to have to come forward to deny any access Musk and DOGE might have to nuclear secrets.

It is alarming that it has come to such an extent that these clarifications are required, especially given that it has been claimed that the Trump administration has misrepresented DOGE's levels of access in the past. Furthermore, the fact that a department with a quirky name inspired by a shiba inu dog could have potential access to nuclear systems is surreal. Despite Musk's increasing influence in government systems, it was clarified that breaching these systems to gain access to nuclear weapons is not a simple task. However, with an administration that seems to be in constant flux, it is important to examine what might distinguish Musk from a potential disaster.

U.S. nuclear weapons are among the most powerful in the world, capable of causing the extinction of life on the planet. Although the president has the unique authority to launch such weapons, DOGE is closer to the systems that control them. In a recent press conference, Trump mentioned that he had tasked Musk and DOGE with managing expenses at the Pentagon, which could imply access to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

Fortunately, accessing nuclear weapon controls through a computer randomly connected to the DOE's network is virtually impossible. A State Department employee who requested anonymity expressed skepticism about Musk's intentions, stating that it is unpredictable how something like that could happen. To launch a nuclear weapon, physical access to the device is required. The process involves going through several security protocols, which would make it highly improbable for Musk or his employees to execute such an action.

Nuclear command and control systems are not connected to the Internet and operate on a closed network designed solely for these purposes. Many of these systems are outdated and are based on technology from the 1960s and 1970s, although modernization efforts are underway. Moreover, it is a myth that U.S. weapons would automatically launch in the event of a verified attack, as an active decision by the president and approval from various military officials are required.

Despite these reassurances, Alex Wellerstein, an expert on the subject, suggested that Musk might find a more indirect way to access these nuclear capabilities through his influence over the president. This raises a risk scenario, especially considering that the president has the power to delegate military authority in specific circumstances.

Concerns grow when considering that although the nuclear launch process is secure, it could be compromised if existing regulations are ignored. The situation becomes even more complex when accounting for the possibility that personnel related to DOGE may have access to sensitive information that could be of interest to foreign adversaries.

Additionally, the issue of nuclear waste management remains critical, especially since the United States still faces legacies of waste from past nuclear projects. Under the Biden administration, significant resources were allocated for cleaning up this waste, but there are concerns that Musk's and DOGE's approach to environmental issues could be dismissed or misinterpreted.

The modernization of the nuclear arsenal has been underway since the Obama administration, with a projected cost of about $2 trillion. In this context, constant oversight is vital to prevent corruption and misuse of funds, with Musk and DOGE responsible for conducting these audits.

Musk's fast and disruptive work philosophy raises concerns about his ability to operate within the realm of power, especially when regulations that are fundamental to safety may not be taken seriously.

This situation leads to reflection on the current state of governmental controls and the importance of maintaining clear boundaries between access to highly sensitive information and the responsibilities of those who manage it.