Cover Image for A look at the Apple Watch SE in 2025 left me with many improvement requests.
Thu Mar 13 2025

A look at the Apple Watch SE in 2025 left me with many improvement requests.

Open letter to Apple on how to improve the next version of the Apple Watch SE.

The Apple Watch SE, although it has been on the market since its launch in 2022 alongside the Series 8 and the first generation of Ultra, has not received significant updates. While other products from the company, like the iPhone, iPad, and MacBook, have seen improvements since then, the budget model has fallen behind. In a recent review of how the Watch SE positions itself in 2025, it was noted that this device feels outdated and less competitive.

There is speculation that a new SE model could be launched soon, especially after the introduction of the iPhone 16e, suggesting that Apple remains interested in offering more affordable versions of its gadgets. Currently, there is a price difference of approximately $150 between the SE and the Apple Watch Series 10, with the former priced at $249 and the latter starting at $399, with discounts bringing it down to $329. While it is not expected for a budget watch to encompass all the features of the premium model, there are certain specifications that are considered essential in 2025.

One of the most common requests is a larger screen size. Although the SE has adequate brightness and clarity, its screen is still the same as that of older models. An increase in panel size would allow for better display of the information that users typically access.

Additionally, the chip performance in the SE feels slow compared to current models. Upgrading the processor to the S9 from 2023 could contribute to a more responsive experience when opening apps and controlling functions such as music or workouts. Including this improvement could also facilitate features like double-tap to initiate a workout, though it is not critical.

Regarding device charging, while battery life is quite good, the time it takes to fully charge is excessive. A more efficient recharge time would be highly beneficial for users.

As for materials, it is not expected that a budget model would be made from premium materials. The aluminum used in the SE is suitable due to its durability and lightweight properties. Furthermore, there are rumors that the upcoming model could be made of plastic, which could help reduce costs. Accessibility is key to attracting a younger or more budget-conscious audience.

Accuracy in tracking physical activity remains a crucial function. Although the SE lacks certain advanced features like the ECG sensor or body temperature measurement, it still handles the basic monitoring functions adequately.

Finally, while some high-end models include technology such as the UWB chip to help locate lost devices, many users may not miss it in a budget model, as the more essential functions are what truly matter.

In conclusion, the Apple Watch SE, although considered a good buy at its launch, now faces tough competition. With more comprehensive options available on the market at similar prices, Apple has the opportunity to redefine its budget model, focusing on improvements that ensure the device does not feel like an inferior accessory, but rather a viable option for those seeking an affordable smartwatch.